History: uwrif Discussion
Comparing version 7 with version 8
|
@@ -Lines: 30-34 changed to +Lines: 30-37 @@
-==-
- Some researchers already introduced a mid-term feed-back in their classes to improve the quality and effectiveness of their teaching (Diamond 2004). We deployed a similar design with one or more mid-term feedback meetings with the whole class. In our case, we had student learning in the focus point of this design instead of lecturers teaching strategy.
+ Some researchers already introduced a mid-term feed-back in their classes to improve the quality and effectiveness of their teaching (Diamond 2004). We deployed a similar design with one student self-assessment with integrated tutor feedback is one efcient means of helping<br />students overcome unrealistic expectations and focus on their achievement rather than on<br />the input required to produce their work.<br />or more mid-term feedback meetings with the whole class. In our case, we had student learning in the focus point of this design instead of lecturers teaching strategy.
~~green:(o algo així)~~
-==- @@ -Lines: 62-63 changed to +Lines: 65-72 @@
^
+ -==-
+ + ~~green:De: Bull 1999. Parlant sobre Avaluació amb l'asistència d'ordinadors, des del punt de vista del professorat~~ + ^ + The time savings of electronic marking are clearly important but need to be offset against the time invested in writing challenging and effective questions, meaningful feedback and structuring appropriate tests. In addition there may be the need to master software and liase with necessary support staff to enable efficient delivery of the assessment. + ^ |
